Executable AI governance checks mapped to NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and OWASP LLM Top 10. Powers the ABVF behaviour validation layer. Produces audit-grade evidence in JSON and Markdown for every run.
github.com/connectsmartconsulting/aigrc →AI Governance.
Validated. Not Just
Documented.
Compliance tools confirm your controls exist on paper. We confirm they perform under real-world adversarial conditions. Integrated AI governance, cybersecurity validation, and quality engineering assurance. At prices Ontario SMEs can actually access.
The Problem
Organizations deploy AI systems without any real way to validate whether their governance and security controls actually hold up under pressure.
Three Disciplines.
One Integrated Assurance Model.
No other Canadian provider combines quality engineering discipline, AI behaviour validation, and cybersecurity control effectiveness testing in a single offering at SME-accessible pricing.
AI Governance Assurance
Validation of AI system behaviour, bias, drift, and decision transparency against regulatory and ethical frameworks. We test what compliance tools only document.
ABVF FrameworkABVF + aigrc · open sourceCybersecurity Validation
Adversarial testing, red team exercises, control effectiveness verification, and resilience stress-testing of AI-enabled infrastructure under simulated attack conditions.
CEVP FrameworkCEVP + Qopilot · open sourceQuality Engineering Assurance
Test automation audits, release quality validation, and production resilience assessment for AI-integrated software pipelines — from an 18-year practitioner lens.
RES ScorecardRES Scorecard · 18-year practitioner lensFrameworks Built From
18 Years Inside Enterprise Delivery
Three proprietary methodologies under active development. The core differentiator that no advisory firm, compliance tool, or security testing specialist can replicate.
Test how AI models fail before your clients do
A structured methodology for assessing AI model behaviour under production conditions — including adversarial inputs, prompt injection scenarios, and distribution shift detection. Original research into AI failure mode taxonomy specific to enterprise deployment.
Validate controls under pressure, not just at rest
A structured testing approach that validates security and governance controls under simulated attack conditions. Developed from first principles, combining quality engineering and penetration testing disciplines for AI-specific risks.
Quantify resilience against regulatory standards
A benchmarking tool enabling clients to measure their AI system resilience against industry standards and regulatory expectations — producing a defensible, board-ready scorecard with prioritized remediation roadmap.
The Executable Layer
of Our Methodology.
We don't ask clients to trust a black box. The runtime layer of our ABVF and CEVP frameworks is open source on GitHub under MIT licence. Engineering teams can read the code, run it, and verify exactly how their evidence is produced — the opposite of how closed-source platform players operate.
AI copilot that translates aigrc evidence into business-language audit narrative and prioritised remediation. Two commands: author and interpret. Powers the CEVP audit layer. Anthropic, OpenAI, or fully offline.
Fixed Price. Known Outcome.
No Board Approval Required.
Every engagement is fixed-price and outcome-oriented. Tier 1 is deliberately within the discretionary budget of a senior technology manager.
AI Risk Snapshot
- Fixed-scope assessment with prioritized findings
- AI governance risk identification
- DevSecOps pipeline audit
- Compliance readiness check
- Remediation guidance included
- No board approval required
Full Framework Engagement
- Full ABVF or CEVP framework validation
- Documented findings with evidence
- Remediation roadmap
- Adversarial control testing
- Regulatory mapping (Bill 194, PIPEDA, EU AI Act)
- Executive summary for board / investors
Ongoing Assurance Partner
- Monthly assurance reporting
- Drift monitoring & alerting
- Continuous improvement support
- Annual resilience programme
- DevSecOps assurance partnership
- Priority response SLA
Compare: Big Four advisory engagements run $80,000 – $500,000 (advice only). Closed-source platforms (Credo AI, HiddenLayer, Robust Intelligence) run $50,000 – $200,000/year for tooling you cannot audit. We deliver methodology-driven, practitioner-led assurance starting at $3,500 — with the runtime open-sourced on GitHub.
The Inside-Out
Advantage
Advisory firms advise from the outside. We validate from inside the same delivery mindset that built the systems you need assurance on.
Practitioner Depth No Advisory Firm Can Replicate
18 years building and transforming the exact AI-enabled enterprise systems we are now hired to validate. We see vulnerabilities as defects waiting to happen — not as an afterthought.
Open Source as a Trust Signal
Our methodology runtime is on GitHub under MIT licence. Engineering teams audit the code, run it themselves, and verify exactly how their evidence is produced. No black-box scoring. No proprietary lock-in. The opposite of how the platform players in this space operate.
Fixed Price, Real Outcomes
Every engagement is fixed-price and outcome-oriented. No surprise invoices. A Tier 1 assessment can be approved in a single conversation without board sign-off.
| Capability | Big Four | MDR Providers | Connect Smart |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Behaviour Validation | Advisory | ✕ | ✓ |
| Adversarial Control Testing | Limited | Partial | ✓ |
| Quality Engineering Lens | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Integrated Assurance Model | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| SME-Accessible Pricing | ✕ | Partial | ✓ |
| Open Source Methodology Runtime | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Ontario SME Focus | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
Built for the Deadlines
Arriving in Months, Not Years
Our frameworks are designed to help organisations meet their compliance obligations with executable evidence — not just documented policies.
Algorithmic discrimination law. NIST AI RMF named as the explicit safe harbour. Documentation no longer enough.
High-risk AI obligations live. Robustness and cybersecurity testing mandated by statute.
Already in force. NIST AI RMF is the explicit safe harbour for Texas-active organisations.
Ontario's Responsible AI and Data Act. Demonstrable AI governance, not documented policy.
Strengthening enforcement around AI-driven decisions and personal data, replacing PIPEDA.
18 Years Inside the Systems You Need Assurance On
I have spent 18 years inside enterprise delivery teams as a QA and DevSecOps leader, building, testing, and transforming the exact kinds of AI-enabled systems that organizations now need to govern and secure.
During that time I watched organizations deploy increasingly complex AI systems without any real way to validate whether their governance and security controls actually hold up under pressure. Compliance tools tell you the controls exist on paper. Nobody is testing whether they perform when something goes wrong.
That gap is what Connect Smart Consulting is built to fill. The founding perspective is not borrowed from a textbook. It was developed through nearly two decades of enterprise delivery at the intersection of quality, security, and regulated system design.
SAFe Agilist & Practitioner
Certified SA and SP. Led QA strategy within Agile Release Trains, aligning delivery speed with quality, security, and compliance across distributed enterprise programmes.
DevSecOps Transformation
AWS Cloud Practitioner and AWS DevOps Engineer certified. Designed scalable DevSecOps pipelines embedding security-first practices and translating SLAs into actionable NFRs.
AI Governance Professional
Certified AIGP and ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementor. Qualified to design and audit AI management systems against the global standard for responsible AI deployment.
Cybersecurity & Quality Engineering
Post-Graduate Diploma in Cybersecurity. Treats vulnerabilities as defects waiting to happen and security as a foundational engineering requirement. Eighteen years in the making.
Your AI Assurance Gap
Is Real. Let's Find It.
Book a free 30-minute discovery call. We will identify your most pressing AI assurance gaps and recommend the right starting point. No commitment required.
Ottawa-based · Remote delivery worldwide · Response within 1 business day
// Currently accepting two design-partner engagements at reduced pilot pricing in exchange for case-study rights.