Ontario · AI Assurance Engineering · Open Source on GitHub

AI Governance.
Validated. Not Just
Documented.

Compliance tools confirm your controls exist on paper. We confirm they perform under real-world adversarial conditions. Integrated AI governance, cybersecurity validation, and quality engineering assurance. At prices Ontario SMEs can actually access.

18
Years Practitioner Experience
3
Proprietary Frameworks
$3.5K
Starting vs $80K Big Four

Organizations deploy AI systems without any real way to validate whether their governance and security controls actually hold up under pressure.

🎯
Prompt Injection & Agent MisuseAdversarial manipulation of AI agents, completely untested by current tools
📉
Model Drift in ProductionAI behaviour degrades over time; compliance tools don't detect live drift
🔒
Controls That Look Good on PaperGRC platforms document policies. They cannot test them under simulated attack.
⚖️
Regulatory Deadlines in Months, Not YearsColorado SB205 (Jun 2026), EU AI Act Art. 15 (Aug 2026), Texas TRAIGA (active), Ontario Bill 194. Demonstrable evidence — not policy PDFs.

Three Disciplines.
One Integrated Assurance Model.

No other Canadian provider combines quality engineering discipline, AI behaviour validation, and cybersecurity control effectiveness testing in a single offering at SME-accessible pricing.

🤖

AI Governance Assurance

Validation of AI system behaviour, bias, drift, and decision transparency against regulatory and ethical frameworks. We test what compliance tools only document.

ABVF Framework
Powered by ABVF + aigrc · open source
⚙️

Quality Engineering Assurance

Test automation audits, release quality validation, and production resilience assessment for AI-integrated software pipelines — from an 18-year practitioner lens.

RES Scorecard
Powered by RES Scorecard · 18-year practitioner lens

Frameworks Built From
18 Years Inside Enterprise Delivery

Three proprietary methodologies under active development. The core differentiator that no advisory firm, compliance tool, or security testing specialist can replicate.

ABVF
AI Behaviour Validation Framework

Test how AI models fail before your clients do

A structured methodology for assessing AI model behaviour under production conditions — including adversarial inputs, prompt injection scenarios, and distribution shift detection. Original research into AI failure mode taxonomy specific to enterprise deployment.

Prompt InjectionDrift DetectionAgent Misuse
Runtimeaigrc ↗
CEVP
Control Effectiveness Verification Protocol

Validate controls under pressure, not just at rest

A structured testing approach that validates security and governance controls under simulated attack conditions. Developed from first principles, combining quality engineering and penetration testing disciplines for AI-specific risks.

Red TeamAttack SimulationControl Testing
RES
Resilience Engineering Scorecard

Quantify resilience against regulatory standards

A benchmarking tool enabling clients to measure their AI system resilience against industry standards and regulatory expectations — producing a defensible, board-ready scorecard with prioritized remediation roadmap.

BenchmarkingRegulatory MappingBoard Reporting
Runtimev0.3 · roadmap

The Executable Layer
of Our Methodology.

We don't ask clients to trust a black box. The runtime layer of our ABVF and CEVP frameworks is open source on GitHub under MIT licence. Engineering teams can read the code, run it, and verify exactly how their evidence is produced — the opposite of how closed-source platform players operate.

aigrc
pytest for AI assurance.

Executable AI governance checks mapped to NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, ISO 42001, and OWASP LLM Top 10. Powers the ABVF behaviour validation layer. Produces audit-grade evidence in JSON and Markdown for every run.

MIT Licensed Python 3.10+ CI-native v0.1.0
github.com/connectsmartconsulting/aigrc →
qopilot
Evidence becomes audit narrative.

AI copilot that translates aigrc evidence into business-language audit narrative and prioritised remediation. Two commands: author and interpret. Powers the CEVP audit layer. Anthropic, OpenAI, or fully offline.

MIT Licensed Python 3.10+ No telemetry v0.1.0
github.com/connectsmartconsulting/qopilot →
The full RES Resilience Engineering Scorecard is computed from aigrc aggregates over time. Available to retainer clients today; published as open source in the v0.3 roadmap.

Fixed Price. Known Outcome.
No Board Approval Required.

Every engagement is fixed-price and outcome-oriented. Tier 1 is deliberately within the discretionary budget of a senior technology manager.

Tier 1 · Entry

AI Risk Snapshot

$3,500 – $6,000
Fixed price · Delivered in 10 business days
  • Fixed-scope assessment with prioritized findings
  • AI governance risk identification
  • DevSecOps pipeline audit
  • Compliance readiness check
  • Remediation guidance included
  • No board approval required
Start with Tier 1
Tier 3 · Retainer

Ongoing Assurance Partner

$3,000 – $8,000/mo
Quarterly reviews · Continuous monitoring
  • Monthly assurance reporting
  • Drift monitoring & alerting
  • Continuous improvement support
  • Annual resilience programme
  • DevSecOps assurance partnership
  • Priority response SLA
Discuss Retainer

Compare: Big Four advisory engagements run $80,000 – $500,000 (advice only). Closed-source platforms (Credo AI, HiddenLayer, Robust Intelligence) run $50,000 – $200,000/year for tooling you cannot audit. We deliver methodology-driven, practitioner-led assurance starting at $3,500 — with the runtime open-sourced on GitHub.

The Inside-Out
Advantage

Advisory firms advise from the outside. We validate from inside the same delivery mindset that built the systems you need assurance on.

01

Practitioner Depth No Advisory Firm Can Replicate

18 years building and transforming the exact AI-enabled enterprise systems we are now hired to validate. We see vulnerabilities as defects waiting to happen — not as an afterthought.

02

Open Source as a Trust Signal

Our methodology runtime is on GitHub under MIT licence. Engineering teams audit the code, run it themselves, and verify exactly how their evidence is produced. No black-box scoring. No proprietary lock-in. The opposite of how the platform players in this space operate.

03

Fixed Price, Real Outcomes

Every engagement is fixed-price and outcome-oriented. No surprise invoices. A Tier 1 assessment can be approved in a single conversation without board sign-off.

CapabilityBig FourMDR ProvidersConnect Smart
AI Behaviour ValidationAdvisory
Adversarial Control TestingLimitedPartial
Quality Engineering Lens
Integrated Assurance Model
SME-Accessible PricingPartial
Open Source Methodology Runtime
Ontario SME Focus

Built for the Deadlines
Arriving in Months, Not Years

Our frameworks are designed to help organisations meet their compliance obligations with executable evidence — not just documented policies.

Colorado SB205
Enforcement · Jun 2026

Algorithmic discrimination law. NIST AI RMF named as the explicit safe harbour. Documentation no longer enough.

EU AI Act
Article 15 · Aug 2026

High-risk AI obligations live. Robustness and cybersecurity testing mandated by statute.

Texas TRAIGA
Active · Jan 2026

Already in force. NIST AI RMF is the explicit safe harbour for Texas-active organisations.

Ontario Bill 194
Provincial · In force

Ontario's Responsible AI and Data Act. Demonstrable AI governance, not documented policy.

Privacy Reform
Federal · Incoming

Strengthening enforcement around AI-driven decisions and personal data, replacing PIPEDA.

👤
Safiuddin Mohammed Ahmed
Founder & Principal
SAFe Agilist (SA)
SAFe Practitioner (SP)
AWS Cloud Practitioner
AWS DevOps Engineer
PG Diploma in Cybersecurity
AIGP: AI Governance Professional
ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementor

18 Years Inside the Systems You Need Assurance On

I have spent 18 years inside enterprise delivery teams as a QA and DevSecOps leader, building, testing, and transforming the exact kinds of AI-enabled systems that organizations now need to govern and secure.

During that time I watched organizations deploy increasingly complex AI systems without any real way to validate whether their governance and security controls actually hold up under pressure. Compliance tools tell you the controls exist on paper. Nobody is testing whether they perform when something goes wrong.

That gap is what Connect Smart Consulting is built to fill. The founding perspective is not borrowed from a textbook. It was developed through nearly two decades of enterprise delivery at the intersection of quality, security, and regulated system design.

SAFe Agilist & Practitioner

Certified SA and SP. Led QA strategy within Agile Release Trains, aligning delivery speed with quality, security, and compliance across distributed enterprise programmes.

DevSecOps Transformation

AWS Cloud Practitioner and AWS DevOps Engineer certified. Designed scalable DevSecOps pipelines embedding security-first practices and translating SLAs into actionable NFRs.

AI Governance Professional

Certified AIGP and ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Implementor. Qualified to design and audit AI management systems against the global standard for responsible AI deployment.

Cybersecurity & Quality Engineering

Post-Graduate Diploma in Cybersecurity. Treats vulnerabilities as defects waiting to happen and security as a foundational engineering requirement. Eighteen years in the making.

Your AI Assurance Gap
Is Real. Let's Find It.

Book a free 30-minute discovery call. We will identify your most pressing AI assurance gaps and recommend the right starting point. No commitment required.

Ottawa-based · Remote delivery worldwide · Response within 1 business day

// Currently accepting two design-partner engagements at reduced pilot pricing in exchange for case-study rights.